Framework
Loss Landscape Vocabulary Framework
v12 · April 2026 · Atlas Heritage Systems Inc. · Working document — not a finished product
Flow & Resistance Vocabulary
Describes what happens at interaction points between terrain and navigator. These are illustration vocabulary derived from fluid dynamics — not a formal third layer. The Reynolds number analogy is dimensionally incoherent as a formal metric (confirmed by DeepSeek V3 adversarial review) and is retained as illustration only.
The composite opposing force at any point in the loss landscape. Integrates slope, friction, viscosity, tension, and coupling. Resistance is derived, not primary — potential difference is the primary generative quantity.
Stokes (1851) drag; Foret et al. (2020) SAM
Movement through low-resistance regions. Clean, directed, fast convergence toward attractors. Where remagnetization completes without resistance. Archaeological signal absent or already overwritten.
Reynolds (1883); Izmailov et al. (2018)
Movement through high-resistance regions. Slow, contested. The model does not resolve cleanly. Turbulence is only observable during movement — what you read in a frozen model is the scar tissue turbulence left behind.
Reynolds (1883); Dauphin et al. (2014)
Ratio of gradient momentum to local resistance — predicts laminar vs turbulent transition. Retained as illustration only.
Reynolds (1883)
The composite resistance property of a specific location, absorbing all terrain and navigator contributions. The drag coefficient profile across the landscape is what ablation changes.
Keskar et al. (2016); Sagun et al. (2017)